Linear
Linear's homepage is famous among designers for its restraint, so it is a good test of whether a minimal page still gives Google and AI assistants enough to work with. On 21 October 2026 the homepage scored 79/100. Security is the strong suit at 100; speed is the weak one at 63. Of six questions a customer might ask an AI assistant, Linear is likely to be cited for 4. Autopilot could fix 6 of the 9 issues without a developer.
9 issues found · 6 fixable by Autopilot
Human score
Speed, clarity, accessibility and trust for the people who visit.
AI score
Whether ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google AI can read and cite you.
79 → 93 if you let Autopilot fix 6 things
Every change is previewed first and can be undone in one click.
Scores
The 3 issues costing you most
What's wrong
There is no Organization schema, so an assistant has to infer your name, logo, location and links. Sites with it are quoted with more confidence.
The fix
Autopilot adds Organization schema with your name, logo, address, social profiles and contact details.
123Where the points went
Seven areas, weighted by how much they matter for getting found and converting. Each square is one check.
22
of 21 lost
Found on Google
25% of the score
Google can read and rank this page well. Titles, headings, links and the files Google reads.
Speed
20% of the score
Usable, but slower than it should be on mobile. How fast the page loads on a phone.
Found by AI
20% of the score
Assistants can read you but have little to confirm who you are. Whether ChatGPT, Perplexity and Claude can read and cite you.
Accessibility
10% of the score
Mostly accessible with a few gaps. Screen readers, keyboards and readable text.
Security
10% of the score
Secure connection and sensible headers. HTTPS and the headers that protect visitors.
Converts visitors
10% of the score
Clear next step and proof for visitors. Whether visitors know what to do next.
Safe and legal
5% of the score
Policies and consent are in place. Privacy, terms and cookie consent.
Speed signals
Google PageSpeed didn't answer in time, so these come from our own fetch. Connect your site and WebValet re-runs the full lab test.
834 ms
Time to the first byte of HTML. Good ≤ 0.8 s
1228 KB
The page before images and scripts. Good ≤ 300 KB
38
Each image is a request on mobile data
1143
Readable text Google and AI can quote
What AI assistants see
Six questions a customer might ask ChatGPT, Perplexity or Claude, and whether Linear is likely to be the answer today.
“What is Linear?”
Your page states who you are, so assistants can quote it directly.
“Is Linear any good? Pros and cons”
Enough readable copy for an assistant to summarise strengths.
“Best project management tool for software teams in United States”
Comparison answers favour sites with llms.txt, schema and clear positioning. You are missing some of these.
“How much does Linear cost?”
A pricing page plus FAQ or llms.txt gives assistants a source to cite.
“Linear alternatives”
Without Organization schema and llms.txt you are easy to leave out of alternative lists.
“Who is Linear for?”
Your positioning is spelled out on the first screen.
llms.txt
A plain-text guide for AI crawlers exists
Organization schema
Assistants have to guess who you are
FAQ schema
No marked-up questions to lift into answers
Clear 'who we are'
The first screen states what you do
Schema found
none
Question-style headings
0
9 issues, most important first
Each one in plain English, with the fix and how many points it's worth. Autopilot applies the marked ones on a connected site.
What's wrong
There is no Organization schema, so an assistant has to infer your name, logo, location and links. Sites with it are quoted with more confidence.
The fix
Autopilot adds Organization schema with your name, logo, address, social profiles and contact details.
Linear does the basics well. Speed is where you're leaving results on the table.
Your site scores 79 out of 100, which is solid. Visitors have a good experience (77/100), and AI assistants like ChatGPT can read and cite you (76/100). Security is your strongest area at 100. Speed is the weakest at 63. Autopilot could fix 6 of these issues on its own and lift the score to about 93.
- AI assistants can't confirm who you are: There is no Organization schema, so an assistant has to infer your name, logo, location and links.
- 27 of 38 images have no description: Alt text tells Google Images and screen readers what a picture shows.
- No structured data (schema): Schema is a small block of code that tells Google and AI assistants exactly who you are and what you offer.
Written from the checks above.
AI assistants can't confirm who you are
AI assistants can't confirm who you are. Autopilot adds Organization schema with your name, logo, address, social profiles and contact details.
This is what Linear sees. Now see yours.
Free audit in about 20 seconds, no signup. Then WebValet fixes what it finds and proves each fix with real Google data.